| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1177663324.29963.4.camel@localhost> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:42:04 +0200 From: Kasper Sandberg <lkml@...anurb.dk> To: hechacker1 <hechacker1@...il.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: "REPORT: sd-0.46 vs cfs-v6 vs mainline 2.6.21-rc7 Beryl + Video + Audio" On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 21:01 -0700, hechacker1 wrote: <snip> > Overall: > SD-0.46 is my new choice for scheduler. When not under load everything > run's better or similarly to cfs or mainline. Under load however it > shows the most responsiveness. > > Occasionally I had complete mouse freezes with cfs when the system was > busy. But rarely. > > Under SD i haven't seen anything get starved. > > mainline surprisingly works better than i expected, but beryl suffers > and responsiveness suffers under load. Your findings seems somewhat similar to mine, what i have observed is that SD is much more smooth, with vanilla/cfs, under just abit load opengl stuff will stutter, whereas with sd it will simply get slightly(or more, depending on the load) lower fps. > > --hechacker1 > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists