[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070427003216.GM19966@holomorphy.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:32:16 -0700
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mel Gorman <mel@...net.ie>,
David Chinner <dgc@....com>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@...il.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com> writes:
>> In memory as on disk, contiguity matters a lot for performance.
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 12:21:24PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Not nearly so much though. In memory you don't have seeks to avoid.
> On disks avoiding seeks is everything.
I readily concede that seeks are most costly. Yet memory contiguity
remains rather influential.
Witness the fact that I'm now being called upon a second time to
adjust the order in which mm/page_alloc.c returns pages for the
sake of implicitly establishing IO contiguity (or otherwise
determining why things are coming out backward now).
-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists