[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070427102835.GA11449@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 18:28:35 +0800
From: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Michael McConnell <soruk@...dani.co.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Subject: Re: MAINTAINERS file out of date?
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 10:27:47PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> writes:
>>
>>> A lot of that code (although, of course, not all) could be written in C,
>>> though. I'm thinking of taking a stab at rewriting it that way.
>>
>> Is this using the .code16gcc? Or are you thinking of some other
>> technique. Requiring another C compiler to build the kernel would
>> be a pain to use.
>
>.code16gcc was what I was using. There is a GSoC project that I'm
>mentoring to get 16-bit support for gcc, that will be possible to
>eventually migrate to (for code size) if/when it gets implemented and
>gets pushed out far enough, but that's for the future.
>
> -hpa
Thanks! I will take a look at that file.
Maybe we can rewrite them in C, use a 16-bit C compiler to generate AT&T asm code and finally push the asm code in the kernel source tree. But perhaps there is no such ideal compiler. ;)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists