[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704270507110.21003@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 05:12:05 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Chinner <dgc@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mel Gorman <mel@...net.ie>,
William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@...il.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:
> For the TLB issue, higher order pagecache doesn't help. If distros
> ship with a 4K page size on powerpc, and use some larger pages in
> the pagecache, some people are still going to get angry because
> they wanted to use 64K pages... But I agree 64K pages is too big
> for most things anyway, and 16 would be better as a default (which
> hopefully x86-64 will get one day).
Powerpc supports multiple pagesizes. Maybe we could make mmap use those
page sizes some day if we had a variable order page cache. Your stands on
the issue means that powerpc will be forever crippled and not be able to
use its full potential.
> Anyway, for io performance, there are alternatives, dispite what
> some people seem to be saying. We can submit larger sglists to the
> device for larger ios, which Jens is looking at (which could help
> all types of workloads, not just those with sequential large file
> IO).
Right this could help but it is not addressing the basic requirement for
devices that need large contiguuos chunks of memory for I/O.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists