[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070427133947.GB4152@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:39:47 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Chinner <dgc@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mel Gorman <mel@...net.ie>,
William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@...il.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 10:25:44PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Linus's favourite jokes about powerpc mmu being crippled forever, aside ;)
Different mmu. The desktop 32bit mmu Linus refered to has almost nothing
in common with the mmu on 64bit systems.
> >Right this could help but it is not addressing the basic requirement for
> >devices that need large contiguuos chunks of memory for I/O.
>
> Did you read the last paragraph? Or anything Andrew's been writing?
>
> "After that, I'd find it amusing if HBAs worth thousands of $ have
> trouble looking up sglists at the relatively glacial pace that IO
> requires, and/or can't spare a few more K for reasonable sglist
> sizes, but if that is really the case, then we could use iommus
> and/or just attempt to put physically contiguous pages in pagecache,
> rather than require it."
Real highend HBAs don't have that problem. But for example aacraid
which is very common on mid-end servers is a _lot_ faster when it
gets continous memory. Some benchmark was 10 or more percent faster
on windows due to this.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists