[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1177685391.3565.22.camel@johannes.berg>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:49:51 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
suspend2-devel@...ts.suspend2.net, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-pm <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] driver power operations (was Re: suspend2 merge)
On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 16:39 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> Good point. Though if we go for passing the interrupt-enable setting as
> an argument then many drivers will have the same
> "if (irqs_disabled()) return" code. Hm. I guess passing it isn't even
> strictly necessary.
Eh, the point I actually wanted to make is that many drivers don't care
for the irqs disabled case and would have to add code to exclude it.
johannes
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (191 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists