[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46325F89.408@tmr.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:39:37 -0400
From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Reasons to merge suspend2.
John Anthony Kazos Jr. wrote:
>> I didn't read your whole post, it's way too long, but I would like to see
>> your patch in mainline as an option to swsusp. What would make this
>> infeasible?
>
> For one thing, Linus said not but yesterday that he doesn't want multiple
> competing suspend algorithms like this in the kernel at once. (If I parsed
> his message correctly, he doesn't want any in the kernel, but he's putting
> up with it because it seems somewhat needed.)
My take on what he said also included avoiding putting critical stuff in
user space, resulting in problems keeping the whole process consistent.
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists