[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070427141908.114bfe5a.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:19:08 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: "Tim Hockin" <thockin@...gle.com>
Cc: ak@....de, vojtech@...e.cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: dynamic MCE poll interval
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:51:28 -0700 Tim Hockin wrote:
> This is the third version of this patch. The only change from the prior
> version is to use time_after_eq().
>
> diff -pruN linux-2.6.20/arch/x86_64/kernel/mce.c
> linux-2.6.20+th/arch/x86_64/kernel/mce.c
> --- linux-2.6.20/arch/x86_64/kernel/mce.c 2007-04-27 10:01:02.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6.20+th/arch/x86_64/kernel/mce.c 2007-04-27 10:41:02.000000000 -0700
> @@ -349,17 +351,30 @@ static void mcheck_timer(struct work_str
> * writes.
> */
> if (notify_user && console_logged) {
> + static unsigned long last_print = 0;
Don't need to init statics to 0...
> + unsigned long now = jiffies;
> +
> + /* if we logged an MCE, reduce the polling interval */
> + next_interval = max(next_interval/2, HZ/100);
> notify_user = 0;
> clear_bit(0, &console_logged);
> - printk(KERN_INFO "Machine check events logged\n");
> + if (time_after_eq(now, last_print + (check_interval*HZ))) {
> + last_print = now;
> + printk(KERN_INFO "Machine check events logged\n");
> + }
> + } else {
> + next_interval = min(next_interval*2, check_interval*HZ);
> }
> +
> + schedule_delayed_work(&mcheck_work, next_interval);
> }
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists