[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070428001923.15074234@the-village.bc.nu>
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:19:23 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...l.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Benedikt Spranger <b.spranger@...utronix.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: Flaws with "UIO: Add the User IO core code"
> +static ssize_t uio_read(struct file *filep, char __user *buf,
> + size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> +{
> + struct uio_listener *listener = filep->private_data;
> + struct uio_device *idev = listener->dev;
> + DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current);
> + ssize_t retval;
> + int event_count;
> +
> + if (idev->info->irq == UIO_IRQ_NONE)
> + return -EIO;
> +
> + if (count != sizeof(int))
> + return -EINVAL;
AFAIK we don't currently have any platform that runs binaries with
different sizes of "int" but this is a) an unsigned value anyway, and b)
should be a fixed type (eg u32)
Otherwise it looks ok at the momenmt, although there is a real nasty
waiting for anyone who tries to use it. At the point open is possible or
IRQs can be enabled you are safe in the core merged as idev->info is
always valid, but any driver module trying to go back via info->uio_dev
has a NULL pointer for an early IRQ or open event.
This means that the fasync support in the current code is basically
unusable until this is fixed
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists