linux-kernel - Re: MAINTAINERS file out of date?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4631873B.1000107@zytor.com>
Date:	Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:16:43 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC:	Michael McConnell <soruk@...dani.co.uk>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Subject: Re: MAINTAINERS file out of date?

Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> writes:
> 
>> Thanks for your point. 
>> I know little about virtualization, maybe can't help much. But I am interested
>> in other things you mentioned. AFAIK, segments can't be avoided on i386, and
>> Linux uses them very little, how are they recalculated constantly?
> 
> Look in arch/i386/boot/setup.S it runs in 16bit mode.  We are talking about
> real mode segments not 16bit segments.
> 
> 16bit real mode is a completely different ball game, and why we keep BIOS
> calls isolated to that one dinky file.
> 

A lot of that code (although, of course, not all) could be written in C,
though.  I'm thinking of taking a stab at rewriting it that way.

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/