[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84144f020704280222s42ff99ddg3eea3cb353c8882e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:22:51 +0300
From: "Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: "Oliver Neukum" <oliver@...kum.org>
Cc: "Nigel Cunningham" <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Back to the future.
Hi Oliver,
Am Freitag, 27. April 2007 12:12 schrieb Pekka J Enberg:
> > The problem with writing in the kernel is obvious: we need to add new code
> > to the kernel for compression, encryption, and userspace interaction
> > (graphical progress bar) that are important for user experience.
On 4/27/07, Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org> wrote:
> The kernel can already do compression and encryption.
Yes, if we all could agree on _which_ compression and encryption
algorithm(s) we want to use. It goes beyond that too, where do you
want to save the image? In the swap device or a regular file? And
don't forget about debuggability either. It's faster to do a
snapshot/resume without shutdown/restart in the middle or just do a
snapshot, and examine its contents.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists