[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070428093510.GA7479@ucw.cz>
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 09:35:11 +0000
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Karuna sagar K <karunasagark@...il.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Testing framework
Hi!
> For some time I had been working on this file system
> test framework.
> Now I have a implementation for the same and below is
> the explanation.
> Any comments are welcome.
>
> Introduction:
> The testing tools and benchmarks available around do not
> take into
> account the repair and recovery aspects of file systems.
> The test
> framework described here focuses on repair and recovery
> capabilities
> of file systems. Since most file systems use 'fsck' to
> recover from
> file system inconsistencies, the test framework
> characterizes file
> systems based on outcomes of running 'fsck'.
Thanks for your work.
> Putting it all together:
> The Corruption, Repair and Comparison phases could be
> repeated a
> number of times (each repetition is called an iteration)
> before the
> summary of that test run is prepared.
>
> TODO:
> Account for files in the lost+found directory during the
> comparison phase.
> Support for other file systems (only ext2 is supported
> currently)
Yes, please. ext2 does really well in fsck area, unfortunately some
other filesystems (vfat, reiserfs) do not work that well.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists