[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0704281254280.506@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:57:54 +0200 (MEST)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
cc: linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Ben Collins <bcollins@...ian.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/30] Use menuconfig objects - IEEE1394
On Apr 28 2007 12:41, Stefan Richter wrote:
>
>So, shall I put Jan's patch aside until there is only one stack left?
Sort of.
>Or what about:
>
> menuconfig FIREWIRE_SUPPORT
> tristate "IEEE 1394 (FireWire) support"
>
> config FIREWIRE
> tristate "new FireWire stack, alias Juju"
> depends on FIREWIRE_SUPPORT && !(IEEE1394=y)
> default m
> [...]
>
> config IEEE1394
> tristate "legacy FireWire stack"
> depends on FIREWIRE_SUPPORT && !(FIREWIRE=y)
Would
&& FIREWIRE != y
work?
> default m
> [...]
>
> comment "You can have both stacks installed but should blacklist
> the modules of one of them. Else modules from both
> stacks will be autoloaded on hotplug events."
> depends on FIREWIRE && IEEE1394
If you *really* want to do that, then have it. But when a menu has
two or three choices (in this case: larger subsystems), it's rand()
for me whether or not to convert to menuconfig.
Feel free.
Jan
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists