linux-kernel - Re: Best CONFIG_HZ value for scheduler testing?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4633A0A9.7090105@tmr.com>
Date:	Sat, 28 Apr 2007 15:29:45 -0400
From:	Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
To:	Martin Steigerwald <Martin@...htvoll.de>
CC:	ck@....kolivas.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Best CONFIG_HZ value for scheduler testing?

Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Hi Con and Ingo!
> 
> What would be the best CONFIG_HZ value for scheduler testing? I used 
> 1000HZ for a long time, but use 300HZ since 2.6.20. This worked well 
> enough for sd-0.46 and previous versions and ck patches...
> 
That's a good point, all the tests I've done are at 1000, that's just my 
default and I didn't bother to change it.

-- 
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
   "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/