[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m3abwsciuc.fsf@maximus.localdomain>
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 23:03:23 +0200
From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
To: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...il.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: MODULE_MAINTAINER
Rene Herman <rene.herman@...il.com> writes:
[MODULE_AUTHOR]
> Given that the email address is all that I want to
> supress; how about just deleting that instead?
Makes sense at least WRT the "problematic" modules.
include/linux/module.h says:
/* Author, ideally of form NAME <EMAIL>[, NAME <EMAIL>]*[ and NAME <EMAIL>] */
#define MODULE_AUTHOR(_author) MODULE_INFO(author, _author)
I think we should get rid of the "EMAIL" comments:
/* Author, ideally of form FULL NAME [, FULL NAME ]*[ and FULL NAME] */
#define MODULE_AUTHOR(_author) MODULE_INFO(author, _author)
I'd rather let the respective maintainers/authors take care of "their"
MODULE_AUTHOR entries (though the removal seems sane for me personally).
> I'd prefer that; unlike the name, the adress is information that can
> get outdated
Right
> and moreover, removing the address not only from the
> modinfo output but from the source directly means it can't be mistaken
> for a contact address there either.
Sure.
--
Krzysztof Halasa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists