[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4633B1CE.8050306@wpkg.org>
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 22:42:54 +0200
From: Tomasz Chmielewski <tch@...g.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.21
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> I do hereby promise you to manually ask the submitters of all 1600 open
> bugs in the kernel Bugzilla within one month whether their problem is
> still present with 2.6.21 and forwarding all bugs if the answer was
> "yes" to whoever is the right recipient if you promise me that all bugs
> where the submitter said "yes" will be debugged by a kernel developer
> who knows the corresponding subsystem. [4]
Hmm.
I reported a bug on 2006-08-07 ("ISDN/hisax doesn't work on ARM
architecture"):
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6970
There was not much activity there... and the bug is still opened in
kernel's bugzilla.
However, I received two emails from Andrew Morton on 02.10.2006 - one
with a patch, and the second (automated?) which said:
The patch titled
isdn: work around excessive udelay()
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename is
isdn-work-around-excessive-udelay.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a
subsystem tree
I'm very happy that the bug was fixed, but why wasn't it automatically
closed in bugzilla (I closed it only today as I looked up into bugzilla)?
Do we have some wrong communication here? How many bugs are there that
are falsely opened, when in reality they were resolved long ago?
--
Tomasz Chmielewski
http://wpkg.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists