linux-kernel - Re: random thoughts on DEPRECATED and OBSOLETE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4633D716.2070700@imap.cc>
Date:	Sun, 29 Apr 2007 01:21:58 +0200
From:	Tilman Schmidt <tilman@...p.cc>
To:	"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: random thoughts on DEPRECATED and OBSOLETE

Am 28.04.2007 15:25 schrieb Robert P. J. Day:
> http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Maturity_levels

You note:

> DEPRECATED and OBSOLETE at the very least, whose definitions should be reasonably obvious.

The obviousness is in the eye of the beholder. :-)

For the sake of us non-native speakers, the definitions might
bear spelling out. I know I've had my understanding of those two
terms significantly adjusted during the last discussion of them.

Thanks,
Tilman

-- 
Tilman Schmidt                          E-Mail: tilman@...p.cc
Bonn, Germany
- In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
  In practice, there is.


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (254 bytes)