[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200704290242.43741.caglar@pardus.org.tr>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 02:42:39 +0300
From: "S.Çağlar Onur" <caglar@...dus.org.tr>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Peter Williams <pwil3058@...pond.net.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@...il.com>, Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>,
Zach Carter <linux@...hcarter.com>,
Kasper Sandberg <lkml@...anurb.dk>,
buddabrod <buddabrod@...il.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v7
28 Nis 2007 Cts tarihinde, Ingo Molnar şunları yazmıştı:
> * S.Çağlar Onur <caglar@...dus.org.tr> wrote:
> > If you want some more output/info etc. please just say, i have both v6
> > and v7 available.
>
> could you try the auto-renice patch ontop of -v7:
>
> http://people.redhat.com/mingo/cfs-scheduler/sched-cfs-auto-renice.patch
>
> does this make it behave like -v6?
Ingo, please ignore my first report until i found a proper way to reproduce
the slowness cause currently CFS-v7, CFS-v7 + "renice patch", CFS-v7 + renice
+ your private mail suggestions and CFS-v6 + "PI support for futexes patch"
seems works equally (which is a good thing so X renicing seems really not
needed, and there were no regression instead of my daydreams) or im too tired
to understand the differences.
--
S.Çağlar Onur <caglar@...dus.org.tr>
http://cekirdek.pardus.org.tr/~caglar/
Linux is like living in a teepee. No Windows, no Gates and an Apache in house!
Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists