linux-kernel - Re: Please revert [PATCH] user of the jiffies rounding patch: Slab

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1177803630.3477.3.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date:	Sat, 28 Apr 2007 16:40:30 -0700
From:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc:	akpm@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Please revert [PATCH] user of the jiffies rounding patch: Slab

On Sat, 2007-04-28 at 16:35 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:

> Hmmm... Yes but that looks like it comes from a different function. Slab
> calls
> 
>  __round_jiffies_relative(HZ, cpu))
> 
> And its description says:
> 
> /**
>  *
>  * The exact rounding is skewed for each processor to avoid all
>  * processors firing at the exact same time, which could lead
>  * to lock contention or spurious cache line bouncing.


> This is exactly the wrong thing to do.


is it?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/