linux-kernel - Re: Fw: [PATCH] ia64: race flushing icache in do_no

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4632C977.1040105@yahoo.com.au>
Date:	Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:11:35 +1000
From:	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To:	unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
CC:	rohitseth@...gle.com, Mike Stroyan <mike.stroyan@...com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>,
	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Fw: [PATCH] ia64: race flushing icache in do_no_page path

Nick Piggin wrote:
> Rohit Seth wrote:

>> You mean by user space? If so, then it is user space responsibility to
>> do the appropriate operations (like flush icache in this case).
> 
> 
> No, I mean places that set PG_arch_1. flush_dcache_page. This can
> happen for mapped pages in write, splice, install_arg_page looks
> questionable, direct IO...

Oh, and also ptrace! I think I was almost fooled by that attempt to flush
the cache in copy_to_user_page.

But that also fails if you map the underlying page with multiple virtual
addresses (or processes, if the icache is not flushed on ctxsw), because
those others won't have their caches flushed, right?

-- 
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/