[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070429105314.5791115108@wotan.suse.de>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 12:53:14 +0200 (CEST)
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
patches@...-64.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] [25/48] x86_64: Introduce load_TLS to the "for" loop.
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
GCC (4.1 at least) unrolls it anyway, but I can't believe this code
was ever justifiable. (I've also submitted a patch which cleans up
i386, which is even uglier).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
---
include/asm-x86_64/desc.h | 11 ++++-------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Index: linux/include/asm-x86_64/desc.h
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/include/asm-x86_64/desc.h
+++ linux/include/asm-x86_64/desc.h
@@ -135,16 +135,13 @@ static inline void set_ldt_desc(unsigned
(info)->useable == 0 && \
(info)->lm == 0)
-#if TLS_SIZE != 24
-# error update this code.
-#endif
-
static inline void load_TLS(struct thread_struct *t, unsigned int cpu)
{
+ unsigned int i;
u64 *gdt = (u64 *)(cpu_gdt(cpu) + GDT_ENTRY_TLS_MIN);
- gdt[0] = t->tls_array[0];
- gdt[1] = t->tls_array[1];
- gdt[2] = t->tls_array[2];
+
+ for (i = 0; i < GDT_ENTRY_TLS_ENTRIES; i++)
+ gdt[i] = t->tls_array[i];
}
/*
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists