[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070429105251.D9859151D2@wotan.suse.de>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 12:52:51 +0200 (CEST)
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To: patches@...-64.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] [4/48] x86_64: Don't disable basic block reordering
When compiling with -Os (which is default) the compiler defaults to it
anyways. And with -O2 it probably generates somewhat better (although
also larger) code.
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
---
arch/x86_64/Makefile | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
Index: linux/arch/x86_64/Makefile
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/arch/x86_64/Makefile
+++ linux/arch/x86_64/Makefile
@@ -41,9 +41,6 @@ cflags-y += -mno-red-zone
cflags-y += -mcmodel=kernel
cflags-y += -pipe
cflags-kernel-$(CONFIG_REORDER) += -ffunction-sections
-# this makes reading assembly source easier, but produces worse code
-# actually it makes the kernel smaller too.
-cflags-y += -fno-reorder-blocks
cflags-y += -Wno-sign-compare
cflags-y += -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables
ifneq ($(CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO),y)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists