linux-kernel - Re: Best CONFIG_HZ value for scheduler testing?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0704291606450.22744@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Date:	Sun, 29 Apr 2007 16:07:23 +0200 (MEST)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To:	Martin Steigerwald <Martin@...htvoll.de>
cc:	ck@....kolivas.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>
Subject: Re: Best CONFIG_HZ value for scheduler testing?


On Apr 27 2007 10:44, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
>
>Hi Con and Ingo!
>
>What would be the best CONFIG_HZ value for scheduler testing? I used 
>1000HZ for a long time, but use 300HZ since 2.6.20. This worked well 
>enough for sd-0.46 and previous versions and ck patches...

CONFIG_HZ=1337
(SCNR.)


Jan
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/