linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [37/48] i386: ignore vgacon if hardware not present

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4634D2E6.5000307@goop.org>
Date:	Sun, 29 Apr 2007 10:16:22 -0700
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
CC:	"Antonino A. Daplas" <adaplas@...il.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, patches@...-64.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [37/48] i386: ignore vgacon if hardware not present

Andi Kleen wrote:
> I dropped the patch completely because you said it was already in mainline
> or queued elsewhere. Was that wrong?
>   
I think both patches are actually needed.  The -mm message Antonio
quoted probably refers to the fact that the patch is in your tree, so
Andrew isn't carrying it separately.

The patch called "ignore-vgacon-if-hardware-not-present" on
firstfloor.org is what the name suggests.  It appears to be still
needed, because it still applies.

The patch you've posted here with the subject "i386: ignore vgacon if
hardware not present" is actually i386-eflags-header, but it appears to
have a bad first line, which is why it is posted with the wrong subject.

    J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/