[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200704291928.52575.prakash@punnoor.de>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 19:28:48 +0200
From: Prakash Punnoor <prakash@...noor.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Peter Williams <pwil3058@...pond.net.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, caglar@...dus.org.tr,
Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@...il.com>, Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>,
Zach Carter <linux@...hcarter.com>,
Kasper Sandberg <lkml@...anurb.dk>,
buddabrod <buddabrod@...il.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v7
Am Samstag 28 April 2007 schrieb Ingo Molnar:
> i'm pleased to announce release -v7 of the CFS scheduler patchset. (The
> main goal of CFS is to implement "desktop scheduling" with as high
> quality as technically possible.)
>
> The CFS patch against v2.6.21 (or against v2.6.20.8) can be downloaded
> from the usual place:
I made a quick test with the ac3 encoder aften, I tested against rsdl 0.36 (I
think it was). Time was slightly worse: >5.9 secs (with two threads on
Athlon64 X2 x86_64). mainline gives me 5.4sec. rsdl took 5.8 sec.
I haven't testes earlier cfs nor later sd. Seems scheduler gets optimized more
for single core than smp?
http://aften.sourceforge.net/
Cheers,
--
(°= =°)
//\ Prakash Punnoor /\\
V_/ \_V
Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists