| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1177883521.5791.156.camel@localhost.localdomain> Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 23:52:01 +0200 From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de> Cc: Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>, Diego Calleja <diegocg@...il.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.21 On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 23:21 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > >> > It's not great but it's the best clone of you we've found 8) > >> > >> What exactly is the purpose of the 2.6.21 regressions list in the Wiki? > > > > It's for -stable team. > >... > > Did Greg or Chris say they have spare time for going through this list? Don't be silly, did any of the developers say, that he has spare time to read your regression lists ? Michal posted it to LKML with the relevant developers in CC including the stable team, so they are in the loop for updates, which is a Good Thing! Hey, you did this yourself. It is a great help and as your lists did, Michals list pointed me to a bug, which I would have missed otherwise. So what are you complaining about ? Folks stepped up and built a regression list and posted it to LKML. What's wrong with that ? tglx - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists