[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070428202849.2a506722.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 20:28:49 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@...igh.org>,
Diego Calleja <diegocg@...il.com>,
Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.21
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 17:07:30 -0700 (PDT) Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Apr 2007, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> >
> > Go to http://bugzilla.kernel.org. Hit query. Find the box that says
> > "Bug Changes, Only bugs changed in the last __ days". Stick 7 in it.
> >
> > 74 bugs found.
> >
> > Not hard to do.
>
> And what part of the "directed" did you miss?
>
> Do you really expect me to go there every day to look at all bugs? That's
> nbot a bug tracker. That's just a noise-maker.
>
> It needs to be email, not some "mouse around for 30 seconds and type
> thing", and it needs to be *directed*. Preferably with somebody who
> actually did some manual scanning over it and spent a few minutes just
> looking at whether it looks like a worthy bug.
>
> In other words: we shouldn't have all developers wasting time doing this.
yup.
> It would be much better to have _one_ person (or a group of people) doing
> it,
I am doing that. It's only 5-10 a day - routing them to the relevant
culprit is very little work. It's also very little work for said culprits
to totally ignore said routing, which is a tougher problem.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists