[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1177886010.5791.166.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 00:33:30 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
Cc: Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>,
Diego Calleja <diegocg@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.21
On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 00:19 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Don't be silly, did any of the developers say, that he has spare time to
> > read your regression lists ?
>
> It worked because several people (including Linus) emphasized that
> fixing regressions from this list was important.
Right. Simply because these lists are assembled by someone
- who knows how to pick that reports from the mailinglists
- who knows how to sort them in a useful way
- who knows how to add the relevant folks on CC
- ....
Can you see the pattern ?
> And it failed because many regressions still stayed unfixed and some
> even undebugged.
No it failed not. It is not perfect. Way more bugs, which have been
fixed or are in the debugging process, would have been unnoticed and
ignored otherwise.
> > So what are you complaining about ? Folks stepped up and built a
> > regression list and posted it to LKML. What's wrong with that ?
>
> If it works it's perfectly fine.
It will work not much different from your lists. It'll be not perfect
either.
tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists