[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6bffcb0e0704291548o764fdf2fva6e5e6f839e9790e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 00:48:28 +0200
From: "Michal Piotrowski" <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>
To: "Andi Kleen" <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Adrian Bunk" <bunk@...sta.de>,
"Diego Calleja" <diegocg@...il.com>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Chuck Ebbert" <cebbert@...hat.com>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.21
On 30/04/07, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
> > Right. Simply because these lists are assembled by someone
> >
> > - who knows how to pick that reports from the mailinglists
> > - who knows how to sort them in a useful way
> > - who knows how to add the relevant folks on CC
>
> That all needs to be done by someone initially yes. But then tracking what happens
> afterwards is something that can be distributed. A difficult bug can take a long
> time to resolve and generate a lot of messages; you don't want to require
> the initial sorter to handle all that too.
>
> It's much more scalable to let the developers update the state themselves
> then once they handle the bug.
The actual list of known regressions is wiki based. Everyone can
update bug status, add references etc.
>From time to time, I'll send this list to right people.
>
> -Andi
>
Regards,
Michal
--
Michal K. K. Piotrowski
Kernel Monkeys
(http://kernel.wikidot.com/start)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists