[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070429080559.GB9988@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 10:05:59 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Kasper Sandberg <lkml@...anurb.dk>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Peter Williams <pwil3058@...pond.net.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, caglar@...dus.org.tr,
Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>, Zach Carter <linux@...hcarter.com>,
buddabrod <buddabrod@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v6
* Kasper Sandberg <lkml@...anurb.dk> wrote:
> If you have some ideas on how these problems might be fixed i'd surely
> try fixes and stuff, or if you have some data you need me to collect
> to better understand whats going on. But i suspect any somewhat
> demanding 3d application will do, and the difference is so staggering
> that when you see it in effect, you cant miss it.
it would be great if you could try a simple experiment: does something
as simple as glxgears resized to a large window trigger this
'stuttering' phenomenon when other stuff is running? If not, could you
try to find the simplest 3D stuff under Linux that already triggers it
so that i can reproduce it?
(Also, as an independent debug-test, could you try CONFIG_PREEMPT too
perhaps? I.e. is this 'stuttering' behavior independent of the
preemption model and a general property of CFS?)
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists