[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4635D139.4030609@aitel.hist.no>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:21:29 +0200
From: Helge Hafting <helge.hafting@...el.hist.no>
To: Uwe Bugla <uwe.bugla@....de>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: Critical points about kernel 2.6.21 and pseudo-authorities
Uwe Bugla wrote:
> In this ten Emails you will yourself see the intellectual and technical proof in how far Mr. Chehab is acting with nothing else but:
>
> a. Lies
> b. Unproven thesis
> c. Stigmatizations
>
> and so on.
>
> THIS MAN HAS NO IDEA, BUT HE HAS THE POWER!
>
Please note that there are ways to replace a bad maintainer.
We still try to keep it polite.
But note that you can't have someone "fired", no matter how bad they
do their job. A bad maintainer is usually better than none - the bad
maintainer might improve. Or at least get some simple stuff done.
You therefore replace a bad maintainer by taking over the position.
Contact whoever is above the maintainer (Linus or some other
higher-level maintainer). You explain the problem, and you must also
show that you have the time and knowledge to do a better job.
You can, for example, maintain the same subsystem in parallel. After a
while,
all interested parties sees that your tree works better and that
communicating with you is easier.
If you aren't prepared to do this - then you have to live with the current
maintainer. There is no staff ready to replace maintainers after
complaints, a volunteer doing a better job is always necessary.
Helge Hafting
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists