[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200704301213.l3UCDqgN018906@harpo.it.uu.se>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 14:13:52 +0200 (MEST)
From: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>
To: juergen127@...uzholzen.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Geode-GX1 processor in 2.6.21
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 12:51:05 +0200, Juergen Beisert wrote:
> setCx86(CX86_CCR2, getCx86(CX86_CCR2) | 0x88);
>
> If this register is 0x00 before, it is still 0x00 after this line. If I change
> the line into this:
>
> ccr2 = getCx86(CX86_CCR2);
> ccr2 |= 0x88;
> setCx86(CX86_CCR2, ccr2);
>
> register ccr2 is 0x88 after the setCx86 call and the power saving feature is
> active (and BTW: the TSC is useless then, because it also stops when the CPU
> runs into a HLT instruction).
>
> setCx86 and getCx86 are macros defined in include/asm-i386/processor.h:
>
> #define getCx86(reg) ({ outb((reg), 0x22); inb(0x23); })
>
> #define setCx86(reg, data) do { \
> outb((reg), 0x22); \
> outb((data), 0x23); \
> } while (0)
>
> Maybe the compiler does the wrong thing if someone uses these macros in the
> same instruction?
The compiler is fine, it's the setCx86() macro that is utter crap
because it fails to behave like a function by not evaluating its
arguments before performing its outb() statements.
Converting them to static inlines would be the best solution. Something like
static inline u8 getCx86(unsigned int reg)
{
outb(reg, 0x22);
return inb(0x23);
}
static inline void setCx86(unsigned int reg, u8 data)
{
outb(reg, 0x22);
outb(data, 0x23);
}
ought to work.
/Mikael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists