[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1k5vt3j3u.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 10:47:01 -0600
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
patches@...-64.org, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Subject: Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> writes:
> Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>
>> Sure.
>>
>> Peter do we want to use the bootloader byte and assign lguest it's own
>> bootloader type or do we want to add another field specific to
>> paravirtualized environments?
>>
>
> The bootloader byte is already a bit too overused; I'm a little scared
> that we're going to run out of boot loader IDs as it is.
>
> We probably should add another field, and while we're at it maybe we
> should add a boot loader extension field.
A dedicated subarchitecture field would make sense. One of the pieces
that would be nice is if we could detect other non paravirt
subarchitectures.
James is there a reasonable way to detect voyager at boot time?
So we could potentially have a generic kernel that can also boot on
voyager?
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists