[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704301742390.2985@pentafluge.infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:56:17 +0100 (BST)
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>
To: Helge Hafting <helge.hafting@...el.hist.no>
cc: Uwe Bugla <uwe.bugla@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: Critical points about kernel 2.6.21 and
pseudo-authorities
Hi Helge and others,
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Helge Hafting wrote:
>> what the consequence is. To be truthful I would strategically prefare a
>> vacuum at the price that the work isn't even done for months.
>> ONLY IF there is a personnel vacuum the necessity for others to volunteer
>> will arise.
>>
> A sufficiently bad maintainer will also do it. If lots of submitters send
> their patches to andrew in order to get past a dysfunctional maintainer,
> then the subsystem effectively is unmaintained.
The point is that Uwe patch will generate regressions by breaking for
Twinhan. His patch just removes compilation for dst and dst_ca on Kconfig,
without taking care or driver internals. So, two initialization functions
won't be called by symbol_request(). Although those two functions will be
undefined, as the dvb will do the linkedition at module runtume (if
DVB_ATTACH is selected), modprobe won't detect the lack of those functions.
At the end, cards with ST chips (DST and/or DST CA) will stop working,
without even printing a warning.
I've tried to explain this to Uwe several times, but, at the end, he
always start insulting me and/or other developers.
Cheers,
Mauro.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists