linux-kernel - Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 0/9] Containers (V9): Generic Process Containers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070430181659.GI24350@in.ibm.com>
Date:	Mon, 30 Apr 2007 23:46:59 +0530
From:	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Paul Jackson <pj@....com>,
	menage@...gle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, dev@...ru,
	xemul@...ru, serue@...ibm.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
	haveblue@...ibm.com, svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, balbir@...ibm.com,
	ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	rohitseth@...gle.com, mbligh@...gle.com, containers@...ts.osdl.org,
	devel@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 0/9] Containers (V9): Generic Process Containers

On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 06:23:52PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Umm, no - please naje two versions with and without the lock.

Ok this patch may not be necessary (given Paul's observation that
read_lock will suffice in update_nodemask).

> Also Please fix up the codingstyle, the { belongs onto a line of it's own.

Paul, I suspect that there are a number of Codingstyle related changes you
may need to address in your next version (including the one pointed by 
Christoph) 


-- 
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/