linux-kernel - Re: [patch] cpufreq: do not declare undefined functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704301142320.13464@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date:	Mon, 30 Apr 2007 11:42:44 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] cpufreq: do not declare undefined functions

On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Dave Jones wrote:

> it's just a prototype, so no code is generated by declaring one
> to an unused (or even non-existant) function.
> 
> Or are you using some oddball compiler that warns about this?
> 

If you consider gcc to be oddball, yes.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/