linux-kernel - Re: checkpatch, a patch checking script.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <463535B8.7020101@oracle.com>
Date:	Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:18:00 -0700
From:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To:	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
CC:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: checkpatch, a patch checking script.

Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 04:37:01PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:21:54 -0500 Matt Mackall wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 01:11:01PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 11:11:36AM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
>>>>  > > I'm all ears for additional regexps, bug reports or other suggestions.
>>>>  > 
>>>>  > Neat.
>>>>  > 
>>>>  > Does it check for:
>>>>  > 
>>>>  > functions marked extern?
>> 	data marked extern?
> 
> It's perfectly reasonable to have a data extern declaration in a header file.

but it's not perfectly acceptable to have

extern unsigned long volatile jiffies;

in a .c file.

The biggest problem I'm seeing ATM is that this script is a bit too
simplistic.  It doesn't know what it's looking at.  We'll have to
address that, I think.


-- 
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/