[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070430201659.GA5681@gnuppy.monkey.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:16:59 -0700
From: Bill Huey (hui) <billh@...ppy.monkey.org>
To: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
Cc: Linux Kernel M/L <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Bill Huey (hui)" <billh@...ppy.monkey.org>
Subject: Re: [REPORT] 2.6.21 vs. 2.6.21-sd046 vs. 2.6.21-CFSv7
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 03:58:45PM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Followup: I reran with sd-0.46, setting rr_interval to 40, and then 5
> (default was 16). Neither appeared to give a useful video playback. I
> did try setting the make to nice 10, and that made the playback
> perfectly smooth, as well as response to skip forward and volume change
> happening when the key was pressed instead of eventually.
>
> I also tried raising the nice of X to -10, that made things better on
> display, but I winder if it will let X run ahead of the nice-0 raid threads.
>
> Is this my hardware or is there a really odd behavior here? The sd seems
> to be too fair to cope well with this realistic load, and expecting
> users to nice things is probably morally correct but unrealistic.
People have been reporting very good performance with regards to OpenGL
applications under SD. What is your video driver ? NVidia proprietary ?
OpenGL, X and direct frame buffer access (mplayer and friends) tend not
to interact each other which can result in very different scheduling
characteristics between them.
[please CC the relevant people for their own benefit]
bill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists