[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070430054306.GW943@1wt.eu>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 07:43:10 +0200
From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
Diego Calleja <diegocg@...il.com>,
Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.21
On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 07:37:25PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > My personal experience with bugzilla is that it's very unfriendly to
> > reporters. IMHO it's suitable for tracking unresolved problems along with
> > debug patches, system information etc., but not for _reporting_ new ones.
>
> What did you find unfriendly?
It is too much complicated for new reporters.
I remember I sent a patch by mail for NTP to people at ISC, and they asked
me to pass through bugzilla because it was important for them to track it.
What initially was a 5 minutes email turned to a 30 minutes nightmare with
doubts at every click, and it was even difficult for me to attach the patch.
Later they replied to me by mail, which I consulted from another address, I
replied and was rejected because it was not the same address... I had to be
very very motivated to use such a crap.
Definitely the tool we need if we want to reduce the number of bug reports!
Just my experience as a bug reporter...
Willy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists