[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070430001311.84d0291f.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 00:13:11 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: can a kmalloc be both GFP_ATOMIC and GFP_KERNEL at the same
time?
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 09:40:39 -0400 (EDT) "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com> wrote:
>
> i'd always assumed that the type flags of GFP_ATOMIC and GFP_KERNEL
> were mutually exclusive when it came to calling kmalloc(), at least
> based on everything i'd read. so i'm not sure how to interpret the
> following:
>
> drivers/scsi/aic7xxx_old.c: aic_dev = kmalloc(sizeof(struct aic_dev_data), GFP_ATOMIC | GFP_KERNEL);
> drivers/message/i2o/device.c: resblk = kmalloc(buflen + 8, GFP_KERNEL | GFP_ATOMIC);
>
> clarification?
GFP_ATOMIC implies that the memory comes from the zones which GFP_KERNEL
also uses. So the above usage of GFP_KERNEL is redundant and should be
removed.
The way to understand this is to look at the definitions:
#define GFP_ATOMIC (__GFP_HIGH)
#define GFP_NOIO (__GFP_WAIT)
#define GFP_NOFS (__GFP_WAIT | __GFP_IO)
#define GFP_KERNEL (__GFP_WAIT | __GFP_IO | __GFP_FS)
#define GFP_USER (__GFP_WAIT | __GFP_IO | __GFP_FS | __GFP_HARDWALL)
#define GFP_HIGHUSER (__GFP_WAIT | __GFP_IO | __GFP_FS | __GFP_HARDWALL | \
__GFP_HIGHMEM)
GFP_KERNEL: can sleep, can do IO, can enter filesystems
GFP_ATOMIC: cannot sleep, cannot do IO, cannot enter filesystems
Neither of them contains __GFP_DMA or __GFP_HIGHMEM, so both of them refer
to ZONE_NORMAL and any lower zones (ie: ZONE_DMA)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists