lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070430004305.cedb2e9e.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Mon, 30 Apr 2007 00:43:05 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Bernd Eckenfels <ecki@...a.inka.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@...g.org>,
	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.21


(various cc's reestablished.  Please don't remove cc's when dealing with
kernel people).

On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 06:57:08 +0200 Bernd Eckenfels <ecki@...a.inka.de> wrote:

> In article <20070430030213.GB23336@...sta.de> you wrote:
> > If it is considered useful it shouldn't be a problem to automatically 
> > forward all incoming Bugzilla bugs to linux-kernel.
> 
> Yes, most of it to linux-kernel, some components (netdev@, architecture) to
> a more specific list.
> 

I think it would be a net good thing to send bugme-new notifications to lkml,
actually.  There are only maybe 5-10 per day (mad guess).


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ