[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4636C16F.204@cosmosbay.com>
Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 06:26:23 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
CC: ebiederm@...ssion.com, patches@...-64.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [30/30] x86_64: Add missing !X86_PAE dependincy to the
2G/2G split.
Andi Kleen a écrit :
> From: ebiederm@...ssion.com
>
> When in PAE mode we require that the user kernel divide to be
> on a 1G boundary. The 2G/2G split does not have that property
> so require !X86_PAE
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
> ---
> arch/i386/Kconfig | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/i386/Kconfig b/arch/i386/Kconfig
> index 1a94a73..80003de 100644
> --- a/arch/i386/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/i386/Kconfig
> @@ -570,6 +570,7 @@ choice
> depends on !HIGHMEM
> bool "3G/1G user/kernel split (for full 1G low memory)"
> config VMSPLIT_2G
> + depends on !X86_PAE
> bool "2G/2G user/kernel split"
> config VMSPLIT_1G
> bool "1G/3G user/kernel split"
Hum... We lose a usefull 2G/2G split. Should'nt we use a patch to change
PAGE_OFFSET to 0x8000000 instead of 0x78000000 and keep 2G/2G split ?
Maybe the following patch is better ?
[PATCH] i386 : Adjust CONFIG_PAGE_OFFSET in case of 2G/2G split and X86_PAE
When in PAE mode we require that the user kernel divide to be
on a 1G boundary. We must therefore make sure PAGE_OFFSET is correctlty
defined in the 2G/2G split and PAE mode.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
View attachment "i386_CONFIG_PAGE_OFFSET.patch" of type "text/plain" (415 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists