[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070501080151.GS21015@kernel.dk>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 10:01:51 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Zan Lynx <zlynx@....org>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [-mm patch] i386: enable 4k stacks by default
On Tue, May 01 2007, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Monday April 30, jens.axboe@...cle.com wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 30 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 06:55:52PM +1000, Neil Brown wrote:
> > > > On Saturday April 28, zlynx@....org wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, 2007-04-28 at 21:19 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > > > > 4k stacks have become a well-tested feature used fore a long time in
> > > > > > Fedora and even in RHEL 4.
> > > > >
> > > > > So has anyone fixed the bugs involving ext3 and LVM snapshots on top of
> > > > > DM mirror?
> > > >
> > > > Well -mm has a patch which makes stacked block devices much less of an
> > > > issue, but this hasn't made it -linus yet - I think the dm developer
> > > > isn't happy that dm works properly with it.
> > >
> > > I get a little tired about this objection. If the particular dm code
> > > was racy before and this can in theory make it worse it's their problem,
> > > and putting in perfectly fine code will give them an incentive to
> > > fix their year old race.
> >
> > Agree, Neil would you mind if I merged the patch?
>
> I am perfectly happy with this patch being merged - yes.
Ok, queued for inclusion.
--
Jens Axboe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists