[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070501015422.4b54a5d0.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 01:54:22 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@...e.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans -- vm bugfixes
On Tue, 01 May 2007 18:44:07 +1000 Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au> wrote:
> > mm-simplify-filemap_nopage.patch
> > mm-fix-fault-vs-invalidate-race-for-linear-mappings.patch
> > mm-merge-populate-and-nopage-into-fault-fixes-nonlinear.patch
> > mm-merge-nopfn-into-fault.patch
> > convert-hugetlbfs-to-use-vm_ops-fault.patch
> > mm-remove-legacy-cruft.patch
> > mm-debug-check-for-the-fault-vs-invalidate-race.patch
>
> > mm-fix-clear_page_dirty_for_io-vs-fault-race.patch
>
> > Miscish MM changes. Will merge, dependent upon what still applies and works
> > if the moveable-zone patches get stalled.
>
> These fix some bugs in the core vm, at least the former one we have
> seen numerous people hitting in production...
>
> I don't suppose you mean these are logically dependant on new features
> sitting below them in your patch stack, just that you don't want to
> spend time fixing a lot of rejects?
It'll probably be OK - I just haven't checked yet. I'm fairly handy at
fixing rejects nowadays ;)
Nobody seems to be taking up this opportunity to provide us with review
and test results on the antifrag patches.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists