[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0705011202510.18504@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 12:12:36 +0200 (MEST)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>
cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-pcmcia@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: pcmcia ioctl removal
On May 1 2007 05:16, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
>on the other hand, the features removal file contains the following:
>
>...
>What: PCMCIA control ioctl (needed for pcmcia-cs [cardmgr, cardctl])
>When: November 2005
>...
>
>in other words, the PCMCIA ioctl feature *has* been listed as obsolete
>for quite some time, and is already a *year and a half* overdue for
>removal.
>
>in short, it's annoying to take the position that stuff can't be
>deleted without warning, then turn around and be reluctant to remove
>stuff for which *more than ample warning* has already been given.
>doing that just makes a joke of the features removal file, and makes
>you wonder what its purpose is in the first place.
>
>a little consistency would be nice here, don't you think?
I think this could raise their attention...
init/Makefile
obj-y += obsolete.o
init/obsolete.c:
static __init int obsolete_init(void)
{
printk("\e[1;31m""
The following stuff is gonna get removed \e[5;37m SOON: \e[0m
- cardmgr
- foobar
- bweebol
");
schedule_timeout(3 * HZ);
return;
}
static __exit void obsolete_exit(void) {}
Jan
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists