[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1178021516.4372.62.camel@daplas>
Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 20:11:56 +0800
From: "Antonino A. Daplas" <adaplas@...il.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Albert Cahalan <acahalan@...il.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, aeb@....nl,
hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: console font limits
On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 13:49 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Tue, 1 May 2007, Albert Cahalan wrote:
> > I'm having problems with a font I just created. It's a rather big one,
> > intended for a framebuffer console in UTF-8 mode. The strace program
> > reports that /bin/setfont fails on a KDFONTOP ioctl with EINVAL.
> > In reading the kernel code, I find this:
> >
> > vt.c:static int con_font_set(struct vc_data *vc, struct console_font_op *op)
> > vt.c-{
> > vt.c- struct console_font font;
> > vt.c- int rc = -EINVAL;
> > vt.c- int size;
> > vt.c-
> > vt.c- if (vc->vc_mode != KD_TEXT)
> > vt.c- return -EINVAL;
> > vt.c- if (!op->data)
> > vt.c- return -EINVAL;
> > vt.c- if (op->charcount > 512)
> > vt.c- return -EINVAL;
> >
> > Ouch. Why is the old VGA limit being applied to the framebuffer console?
> > Could this just get removed? I dearly hope we aren't still storing the
> > framebuffer data as two bytes per character+attribute pair.
>
> The shadow screen (accessed using scr_*()) still uses the old VGA
> format.
And this will entail a lot of work to change (Is it worth it to rework
the code and remove the limitation?). The linux-console project
(http://linuxconsole.sourceforge.net/) might have , but I don't know its
current status.
Tony
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists