[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070501174033.2046f289@the-village.bc.nu>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 17:40:33 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [stable] to something appropriate (was Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge
plans)
> > But distros can easily add the device id to their kernel if needed, it
> > isn't something that the -stable tree shoud be accepting. Otherwise, we
> > will be swamped with those types of patches...
> >
>
> Oh sure, leave the distros swamped with them instead. :)
>
> And they all have to do it separately, meaning they don't stay in sync
> and they duplicate each other's work...
Well they *don't* have to work that separately. They could set up some
shared tree which would look suspiciously like what Greg is doing but
with the ID updates.... ;)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists