[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070430192544.5ee78178.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:25:44 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Neela Kolli <Neela.Kolli@...enio.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] megaraid: fix CONFIG_PROC_FS compile errors
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 08:44:14 -0700 Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 07:35:00 -0700 (PDT) David Rientjes wrote:
>
> > Only declare mega_proc_dir_entry() in CONFIG_PROC_FS. We should call
> > mega_create_proc_entry() only in this configuration so make sure it's defined
> > if we call it.
> >
> > Only define mega_adapinq() in CONFIG_PROC_FS. mega_internal_dev_inquiry()
> > and mega_print_inquiry() were never declared without CONFIG_PROC_FS so
> > make sure we don't have prototypes for them if we aren't going to define
> > them.
> >
> > Move the declaration of 'buf' in mega_remove_one() because we only use it
> > in the CONFIG_PROC_FS case.
>
> Just noting the presence of:
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21-rc7/2.6.21-rc7-mm2/broken-out/megaraid-fix-warnings-when-config_proc_fs=n.patch
>
That patch has been submitted fourteen times in the past year, and was
completely ignored each time.
>
> Oh, and that SCSI patches need to go to the linux-scsi mailing list.
>
There seem to be little point in doing that.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists