linux-kernel - Re: linux-cifs-client Digest, Vol 42, Issue 1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <463779D4.9010507@us.ibm.com>
Date:	Tue, 01 May 2007 12:33:08 -0500
From:	"Steve French (smfltc)" <smfltc@...ibm.com>
To:	linux-cifs-client@...ts.samba.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de
Subject: Re: linux-cifs-client Digest, Vol 42, Issue 1

> what also puzzles me... almost every filesystem that's not at revision 1
> anymore (ext2/3/4, reiser4, smb2) does not have the usually omnipresent "fs"
> suffix anymore (cf. reiserfs, smbfs).
> Maybe it's time to drop all the "fs" suffixes?  :) 

For the case of cifs (and nfs and afs) the "fs" is part of the name of 
the protocol ("common internet file system [protocol]") but for the 
other filesystems I agree that it seems redundant to put "fs" in the 
name (with a few exceptions e.g. "GFS2" would sound strange if named 
"G2" or "global2", and OCFS2 is presumably a product name).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/