[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200705011923.14950.molletts@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 19:23:14 +0100
From: Stephen Mollett <molletts@...oo.com>
To: bfennema@...con.csc.calpoly.edu
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2.6.21] udf: Decrement correct link count in udf_rmdir
It appears that a minor thinko occurred in udf_rmdir and the (already-cleared)
link count on the directory that is being removed was being decremented
instead of the link count on its parent directory. This gives rise to lots of
kernel messages similar to:
UDF-fs warning (device loop1): udf_rmdir: empty directory has nlink != 2 (8)
when removing directory trees. No other ill effects have been observed but I
guess it could theoretically result in the link count overflowing on a very
long-lived, much modified directory.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Mollett <molletts@...oo.com>
---
Patch applies cleanly to latest git snapshot and other recent 2.6 kernels.
Please CC: me as I'm not currently subscribed to linux-kernel.
First attempt at formally submitting a kernel patch - apologies if I've cocked
something up - please be nice :-)
--- linux-2.6.21/fs/udf/namei.c.orig 2007-05-01 18:52:02.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.21/fs/udf/namei.c 2007-05-01 18:53:00.000000000 +0100
@@ -878,7 +878,7 @@ static int udf_rmdir(struct inode * dir,
inode->i_nlink);
clear_nlink(inode);
inode->i_size = 0;
- inode_dec_link_count(inode);
+ inode_dec_link_count(dir);
inode->i_ctime = dir->i_ctime = dir->i_mtime = current_fs_time(dir->i_sb);
mark_inode_dirty(dir);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists